The Stats Room: How Long Does Last Year Matter?

The Stats Room: How Long Does Last Year Matter?

This article is part of our The Stats Room series.

Patience is not really a trait for most fantasy football owners. We are ready to move past last season's hot commodity and find the newest hot player who happened to have a couple hot games. The deal is, we have known production from 16 2015 games compared to two games in the 2016 season.

This week, I will look for the point that last year's production still takes precedence and the point that the current season stats take over.

I almost cringe at times when I hear an announcer say a player's previous season's production just needs to be ignored. Nothing is more wrong. The player aged (and likely declined), but they don't completely change. Sure some players have change teams, coaches, offensive schemes, etc. Others have been hurt or are competing with a rookie. But last year still matters.

Time for some numbers.

Looking only at running backs and wide receivers, I considered the 1,000 players in each position group who had the most handoffs plus targets from 2000 to 2014 and found their average standard-scoring points per game for each season, their weekly average points at a season's start and their average points to end the season. With the three values, I found the following data:

The r-squared (how well the data correlates) from the previous season compared to the rest of the remaining games.

The r-squared from the season's first games compared to the rest of the remaining games.

The r-squared of a linear

Patience is not really a trait for most fantasy football owners. We are ready to move past last season's hot commodity and find the newest hot player who happened to have a couple hot games. The deal is, we have known production from 16 2015 games compared to two games in the 2016 season.

This week, I will look for the point that last year's production still takes precedence and the point that the current season stats take over.

I almost cringe at times when I hear an announcer say a player's previous season's production just needs to be ignored. Nothing is more wrong. The player aged (and likely declined), but they don't completely change. Sure some players have change teams, coaches, offensive schemes, etc. Others have been hurt or are competing with a rookie. But last year still matters.

Time for some numbers.

Looking only at running backs and wide receivers, I considered the 1,000 players in each position group who had the most handoffs plus targets from 2000 to 2014 and found their average standard-scoring points per game for each season, their weekly average points at a season's start and their average points to end the season. With the three values, I found the following data:

The r-squared (how well the data correlates) from the previous season compared to the rest of the remaining games.

The r-squared from the season's first games compared to the rest of the remaining games.

The r-squared of a linear regression using the previous season's and season's first games compared to the rest of the remaining games.

For the regression, the weighted percentage that should be given to the previous season's stats.

For the regression, the weighted percentage that should be given to this early season's stats.

Now off to the running backs.

Running Backs

I will start with the results and then dissect them.

PREV. SEASON
AVG R2
PREV. WK(s)
AVG SCORE R2
COMBINATIONPREV. YEAR%CURRENT YEAR%
1 Week 0.39 0.34 0.85 70.1% 29.9%
2 Weeks 0.39 0.42 0.86 57.0% 43.0%
3 Weeks 0.38 0.46 0.87 50.1% 49.9%
4 Weeks 0.35 0.49 0.87 42.6% 57.4%
5 Weeks 0.33 0.5 0.86 36.3% 63.7%
6 Weeks 0.33 0.51 0.87 34.0% 66.0%
7 Weeks 30.9% 69.1%
8 Weeks 28.1% 71.9%
9 Weeks 25.7% 74.3%
10 Weeks 23.6% 76.4%
11 Weeks 21.6% 78.4%
12 Weeks 19.8% 80.2%
13 Weeks 18.2% 81.8%
14 Weeks 16.7% 83.3%
15 Weeks 15.2% 84.8%

I ran the numbers for each of the first six weeks of data. The results are as expected. To start with, the previous season's data is more important, but the current stats take over rather quickly. When comparing the historic data to the future data, the correlations aren't the best with previous weeks' worth of data hitting an R-squared of .50 after three weeks.

Now, when both previous values are combined, the results look much better with R-squared values greater than .85. After Week 3, the two values are weighted 50-50 and then the current year's data begin to take precedence. The previous season still has some weight and doesn't go away.

With six weeks of data, I decided to project the rest of the season's weights.

Now, if someone wants to go full nerd, here is the equation to get a projected rest of season average stat:

Average points per week = (Average of Current Year)*(.2054*LN(Weeks Completed)+.2914)+(Average of previous season) *(1- (.2054*LN(Weeks Completed)+.2914) )

Finally, here are the top-12 running backs according to their average fantasy points this year.

PLAYERTEAMAVG 2016 PTSAVG 2015 PTSPROJ (57/43)RW PROJDIFF
DeAngelo Williams PIT 24.2 12.1 17.3 30.0 12.7
Matt Forte NYJ 22.2 13.1 17.0 22.3 5.3
C.J. Anderson DEN 20.6 8.0 13.4 18.1 4.7
Spencer Ware KC 18.2 7.0 11.8 10.1 -1.7
Melvin Gordon SD 17.9 6.0 11.1 20.3 9.2
Isaiah Crowell CLE 17.3 7.4 11.7 14.1 2.4
DeMarco Murray TEN 17.1 9.6 12.8 12.6 -0.2
David Johnson ARZ 16.8 11.0 13.5 15.1 1.6
LeGarrette Blount NE 15.7 9.7 12.3 17.2 4.9
Theo Riddick DET 14.7 6.3 9.9 10.7 0.8
Latavius Murray OAK 14.7 10.4 12.2 5.5 -6.7
Ryan Mathews PHI 14.6 8.5 11.1 17.0 5.9

With each running back, I have included their 2015 points, how the two values should be historically weighted and, for a little fun, our official weekly projections and the difference in the two projections. My weighted projections are the averages for the whole season, so on a week-to-week schedule, I would expect some players to be above and some below the weighted estimate.

In this instance, nine of 12 players are expected to outperform estimates. The average projected overshoot is 3.3 points. I will look at the results again next week (and maybe each additional week).

Enough of the running backs, now onto the wide receivers.

Wide receivers

For the results, I went one more week with the actual results before calculating a projection equation. The reason for the extra dataset was that I wanted another set of data after the in-season data precedence took over.

PREV. SEASON
AVG R2
PREV. WK(s)
AVG SCORE R2
COMBINATIONPREV. YEAR%CURRENT YEAR%
1 Week 0.31 0.19 0.87 80.3% 19.7%
2 Weeks 0.29 0.27 0.87 69.7% 30.3%
3 Weeks 0.28 0.31 0.87 61.4% 38.6%
4 Weeks 0.26 0.37 0.88 51.5% 48.5%
5 Weeks 0.25 0.41 0.88 43.3% 56.7%
6 Weeks 0.24 0.42 0.88 39.6% 60.4%
7 Weeks 0.24 0.43 0.88 39.2% 60.8%
8 Weeks 35.1% 64.9%
9 Weeks 32.4% 67.6%
10 Weeks 30.0% 70.0%
11 Weeks 27.8% 72.2%
12 Weeks 25.8% 74.2%
13 Weeks 24.0% 76.0%
14 Weeks 22.2% 77.8%
15 Weeks 20.7% 79.3%

As stated above, the biggest difference between wide receivers and running backs is the extra time it takes for in-season data to become more relevant.

The crossover happens at Week 4, and the previous season's data stays important as the season progresses.

Like with the running backs, here is the ultimate nerd equation to figure out the weekly projection using previous values:

Average points per week = (Average of Current Year)*(.2305*LN(Weeks Completed)+.1692)+(Average of previous season) *(1- (.2305*LN(Weeks Completed)+.1692) )

Again, here is a look at the top-12 wide receivers over the first two weeks with their weight projected and official RotoWire projection.

PLAYERTEAMAVG 2016 PTSAVG 2015 PTSPROJ (57/43)RW PROJDIFF
Kelvin Benjamin CAR 19.0 8.0 11.3 15.1 3.8
Willie Snead NO 17.3 7.8 10.7 12.4 1.7
Stefon Diggs MIN 17.2 7.5 10.4 13.7 3.3
Brandin Cooks NO 17.1 10.6 12.6 14.3 1.7
Larry Fitzgerald ARZ 17.1 11.0 12.8 14.4 1.6
Mike Wallace BAL 16.2 3.7 7.5 10.2 2.7
Corey Coleman CLE 14.7 3.6 7.0 11.2 4.2
Julio Jones ATL 14.6 14.7 14.7 6.0 -8.7
Mike Evans TB 14.5 9.2 10.8 15.8 5.0
DeAndre Hopkins HOU 14.4 13.6 13.8 14.0 0.2
Antonio Brown PIT 14.3 15.4 15.1 15.6 0.5
Eric Decker NYJ 14.2 11.6 12.4 11.3 -1.1

The difference from the simple projection and the official RotoWire projections is not as wide as with the running backs. The difference averages to 1.5 points even with Julio Jones projected to get only 6.0 points instead of the estimated 14.7. Next week, we will see who does better.

Conclusion

A fantasy owner can figure out how much to weigh a position player's previous season production compared to their current season's work. An owner will likely see the weighting change from previous season to current after Week 3 for running backs and Week 4 for wide receivers. The weight from the previous season obviously becomes less as the season goes on, but it never goes away.

Want to Read More?
Subscribe to RotoWire to see the full article.

We reserve some of our best content for our paid subscribers. Plus, if you choose to subscribe you can discuss this article with the author and the rest of the RotoWire community.

Get Instant Access To This Article Get Access To This Article
RotoWire Community
Join Our Subscriber-Only NFL Chat
Chat with our writers and other RotoWire NFL fans for all the pre-game info and in-game banter.
Join The Discussion
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jeff Zimmerman
Jeff is a former RotoWire contributor. He wrote analytics-focused baseball and football articles for RotoWire. He is a three-time FSWA award winner, including the Football Writer of the Year and Best Football Print Article awards in 2016. The 2017 Tout Wars Mixed Auction champion and 2016 Tout Wars Head-to-Head champ, Zimmerman also contributes to FanGraphs.com, BaseballHQ and Baseball America.
NFL Odds Picks and Predictions: Chicago Bears vs. Minnesota Vikings
NFL Odds Picks and Predictions: Chicago Bears vs. Minnesota Vikings
New York Giants vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers NFL Betting Odds, Expert Picks & Props
New York Giants vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers NFL Betting Odds, Expert Picks & Props
Gameday Injuries: Week 12
Gameday Injuries: Week 12
Circa Millions NFL Week 12 Bets
Circa Millions NFL Week 12 Bets