This article is part of our DraftKings League of Legends series.
Wednesday morning's two-game LPL/LCK League of Legends slate was highlighted by the Playoff Special, a $200,000 GPP that paid $50,000 to first place. With only seven roster spots, including a captain, there was always the expectation that we'd see plenty of duplicate lineups, which creates shared winnings. The first-place lineup scored 962.14 fantasy points and was played by 62 different users. Sixty-two identical lineups sounds like a lot, especially if you were one of those people who finished in first place in a tournament that paid $50,000 to first place but you only walked away with $1,547.59. There are certainly plenty of people who would be happy to turn $10 (the entry fee) into $1,547.59, though that didn't happen Wednesday because every single DraftKings player who tied for first submitted multiple lineups, anywhere between two and 150.
In total, there were 22,762 entries in the contest, including 92 empty lineups, with 34 users submitting the maximum 150 lineups and 2,248 single bullets. Here's a breakdown of how many DraftKings players submitted a certain number of lineups in the main GPP:
# of Lineups | # of Users | # of Lineups | # of Users | # of Lineups | # of Users |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
150 | 34 | 47 | 2 | 21 | 7 |
144 | 1 | 45 | 2 | 20 | 32 |
126 | 1 | 42 | 2 | 19 | 8 |
125 | 1 | 41 | 2 | 18 | 7 |
121 | 1 | 40 | 2 | 17 | 8 |
108 | 1 | 38 | 1 | 16 | 16 |
106 | 1 | 37 | 1 | 15 | 16 |
103 | 1 | 36 | 2 | 14 | 14 |
101 | 1 | 35 | 6 | 13 | 17 |
100 | 3 | 34 | 2 | 12 | 28 |
81 | 2 | 33 | 3 | 11 | 25 |
80 | 3 | 32 | 4 | 10 | 62 |
77 | 1 | 31 | 3 | 9 | 34 |
75 | 2 | 30 | 12 | 8 | 61 |
68 | 1 | 29 | 5 | 7 | 73 |
62 | 1 | 28 | 2 | 6 | 125 |
60 | 1 | 27 | 5 | 5 | 183 |
55 | 1 | 26 | 5 | 4 | 245 |
54 | 1 | 25 | 8 | 3 | 399 |
51 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 2 | 812 |
50 | 5 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 2248 |
48 | 1 | 22 | 4 |
Going back to the duplicated lineups topic, we saw a ton of them in this tournament, including the big split for first place. However, there were 43 lineup combinations that were duplicated more than the first-place entry, with the most popular lineup being played an astonishing 592 times. Unfortunately for those users, the lineup finished with 676.42 fantasy points, putting them in a tie for 11,034th (the tournament paid out to the top 5,520 scores).
And it's not like that popular lineup was the only one that was heavily used, as we saw 27 lineups being used at least 100 times. Making matters worse, most of the popular lineups didn't make money, as the 10 most-popular lineups ended under the cash line; and while the 11th-most popular lineup finished tied for 91st, it was also played 224 times. Again, the winning lineup was played 62 times, and of the 43 lineups that were more popular, only four cashed.
Unique Lineups | # of Entries | Rank |
---|---|---|
TOP Canna MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG WEI ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT XiaoBai | 592 | 11034 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Keria JNG WEI ADC Deft TEAM DragonX CPT Wink | 467 | 18387 |
TOP Doran MID Chovy SUP ShiauC JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT Cryin | 456 | 16922 |
TOP Canna MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT XiaoBai | 390 | 7914 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Chovy SUP Keria JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT Cryin | 319 | 17798 |
TOP Canna MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG Cuzz ADC Wink TEAM eStar CPT WEI | 276 | 9293 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Chovy SUP ShiauC JNG Pyosik ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT Cryin | 245 | 17533 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG Pyosik ADC Deft TEAM DragonX CPT Wink | 244 | 18123 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Chovy SUP ShiauC JNG WEI ADC Deft TEAM DragonX CPT Cryin | 242 | 18975 |
TOP Canna MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG Cuzz ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 232 | 7216 |
TOP Canna MID Teacherma SUP Missing JNG beishang ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT Jiumeng | 224 | 91 |
TOP Canna MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG Cuzz ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 167 | 5101 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG Cuzz ADC Teddy TEAM eStar CPT WEI | 157 | 12426 |
TOP Doran MID Cryin SUP Keria JNG WEI ADC Deft TEAM eStar CPT Wink | 156 | 20572 |
TOP Canna MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT ShiauC | 155 | 10386 |
TOP Canna MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG Cuzz ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT XiaoBai | 154 | 9084 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG beishang ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 124 | 6870 |
TOP Doran MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG Pyosik ADC Deft TEAM eStar CPT Wink | 121 | 20401 |
TOP Doran MID Teacherma SUP Missing JNG beishang ADC Deft TEAM DragonX CPT Jiumeng | 117 | 5458 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Keria JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT Deft | 116 | 19965 |
TOP Morgan MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG beishang ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 115 | 10545 |
TOP Doran MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG Pyosik ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT WEI | 105 | 18866 |
TOP Doran MID Chovy SUP ShiauC JNG Pyosik ADC Wink TEAM eStar CPT Cryin | 104 | 20119 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG beishang ADC Jiumeng TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 103 | 6152 |
TOP Doran MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT Deft | 103 | 19465 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG WEI ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT ShiauC | 102 | 12951 |
TOP Canna MID Faker SUP ShiauC JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT XiaoBai | 101 | 10096 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Missing JNG beishang ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 99 | 6545 |
TOP Doran MID Chovy SUP Keria JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM eStar CPT Cryin | 97 | 20303 |
TOP Morgan MID Teacherma SUP Effort JNG beishang ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT Jiumeng | 92 | 1009 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Chovy SUP ShiauC JNG WEI ADC Deft TEAM DragonX CPT Wink | 89 | 19310 |
TOP Morgan MID Teacherma SUP Keria JNG beishang ADC Deft TEAM DragonX CPT Jiumeng | 86 | 9998 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG WEI ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT Canna | 82 | 8594 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Keria JNG Pyosik ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT WEI | 81 | 19604 |
TOP Morgan MID Faker SUP Missing JNG beishang ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT Jiumeng | 76 | 1109 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG Cuzz ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 76 | 7693 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT Cuzz | 75 | 7553 |
TOP Canna MID Faker SUP ShiauC JNG Cuzz ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 70 | 6418 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Faker SUP ShiauC JNG Cuzz ADC Teddy TEAM T1 CPT WEI | 66 | 9762 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG Pyosik ADC Wink TEAM DragonX CPT Deft | 66 | 19817 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Keria JNG Pyosik ADC Deft TEAM eStar CPT Wink | 66 | 21051 |
TOP Doran MID Cryin SUP ShiauC JNG Pyosik ADC Wink TEAM eStar CPT Deft | 64 | 21553 |
TOP XiaoBai MID Cryin SUP Effort JNG WEI ADC Wink TEAM T1 CPT Canna | 63 | 5827 |
TOP Canna MID Faker SUP Missing JNG beishang ADC Jiumeng TEAM T1 CPT Teacherma | 62 | 1 |
In terms of player ownership, Cryin was the most popular at 66.11 percent, followed by WEI at 53.97 percent and Wink at 53.62 percent. They also made up the three highest-captained players, though WEI outpaced Wink there (table is sortable):
Player | Pos | Own% | CPT% | FPTS (not 1.5x) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cryin | MID | 66.11% | 17.91% | 96.54 |
WEI | JNG | 53.97% | 14.78% | 114.93 |
Wink | ADC | 53.62% | 11.49% | 92.88 |
XiaoBai | TOP | 43.78% | 9.25% | 111.60 |
ShiauC | SUP | 38.62% | 2.74% | 57.86 |
T1 | TEAM | 37.55% | 0.05% | 93.00 |
Canna | TOP | 31.65% | 1.90% | 130.14 |
DragonX | TEAM | 30.82% | 0.03% | 39.00 |
beishang | JNG | 28.87% | 2.90% | 141.38 |
Teddy | ADC | 27.92% | 6.44% | 110.66 |
Jiumeng | ADC | 26.83% | 10.09% | 154.64 |
Deft | ADC | 25.28% | 6.66% | 41.68 |
eStar | TEAM | 23.55% | 0.07% | 37.00 |
Teacherma | MID | 22.63% | 4.90% | 200.88 |
Effort | SUP | 22.46% | 0.28% | 109.80 |
Missing | SUP | 21.69% | 0.26% | 114.80 |
Chovy | MID | 20.28% | 2.35% | 42.94 |
Keria | SUP | 19.69% | 0.10% | 12.80 |
Pyosik | JNG | 19.20% | 1.14% | 33.68 |
Doran | TOP | 18.84% | 0.22% | 42.84 |
Cuzz | JNG | 18.07% | 2.40% | 114.30 |
Faker | MID | 17.31% | 3.14% | 127.30 |
Morgan | TOP | 16.33% | 0.38% | 88.82 |
Team WE | TEAM | 7.84% | - | 91.00 |
Quad | MID | 1.37% | 0.20% | 0.00 |
Ellim | JNG | 0.63% | 0.02% | 0.00 |
rat | ADC | 0.47% | 0.15% | 0.00 |
CJJ | TOP | 0.34% | - | 0.00 |
Alu | SUP | 0.32% | - | 0.00 |
Roach | TOP | 0.30% | - | 0.00 |
Gumayushi | ADC | 0.21% | 0.03% | 0.00 |
Kuri | SUP | 0.20% | - | 0.00 |
Gori | MID | 0.18% | 0.03% | 0.00 |
Plex | MID | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.00 |
yimeng | MID | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00 |
Poss | TOP | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00 |
And in following most League of Legends slates, more people used an ADC captain than any other position:
Pos | CPT Pos % |
---|---|
ADC | 34.86 |
MID | 28.58 |
JNG | 21.24 |
SUP | 3.39 |
TEAM | 0.15 |
Finally, a look at stacks. The first-place line was a basic 4:3 stack, using four players from Team WE and three from T1. That combination was used in 1,129 entries, the fourth-highest combination, trailing 4ES/3DRX, 4ES/3T1 and 4T1/3ES. "Traditional" 4:3 stacks accounted for the seven most-popular lineup builds overall, though only two averaged scores higher than the minimum cash score of 745.58. It's also important to note there are 60 possible 4:3 combinations when using two teams, including the captain coming from the four-man team, which is why some 4:3 combinations cash and others do not.
Unique Stack Combinations | # of Lineups with Stack | Avg. Score (min cash score: 745.58) |
---|---|---|
0T1 3DRX 4ES 0WE | 4290 | 462.51 |
3T1 0DRX 4ES 0WE | 2853 | 682.46 |
4T1 0DRX 3ES 0WE | 1141 | 721.99 |
3T1 0DRX 0ES 4WE | 1130 | 917.55 |
0T1 4DRX 3ES 0WE | 856 | 403.45 |
0T1 3DRX 0ES 4WE | 772 | 684.22 |
4T1 0DRX 0ES 3WE | 696 | 905.43 |
1T1 0DRX 4ES 2WE | 648 | 710.46 |
2T1 0DRX 4ES 1WE | 645 | 703.93 |
0T1 1DRX 3ES 3WE | 605 | 724.58 |
0T1 2DRX 4ES 1WE | 532 | 547.47 |
1T1 2DRX 4ES 0WE | 517 | 512.43 |
1T1 0DRX 3ES 3WE | 496 | 773.51 |
4T1 1DRX 2ES 0WE | 474 | 702.75 |
2T1 1DRX 4ES 0WE | 470 | 594.76 |
0T1 4DRX 0ES 3WE | 467 | 567.02 |
1T1 0DRX 2ES 4WE | 430 | 841.78 |
4T1 0DRX 2ES 1WE | 390 | 792.64 |
0T1 1DRX 4ES 2WE | 389 | 643.11 |
3T1 0DRX 2ES 2WE | 361 | 815.26 |
3T1 0DRX 3ES 1WE | 304 | 730.83 |
0T1 2DRX 3ES 2WE | 285 | 631.25 |
2T1 2DRX 3ES 0WE | 278 | 579.44 |
3T1 1DRX 3ES 0WE | 273 | 635.32 |
2T1 0DRX 2ES 3WE | 255 | 826.91 |
0T1 3DRX 3ES 1WE | 241 | 527.19 |
4T1 0DRX 1ES 2WE | 221 | 847.60 |
2T1 1DRX 3ES 1WE | 218 | 657.01 |
2T1 0DRX 1ES 4WE | 200 | 885.24 |
3T1 0DRX 1ES 3WE | 178 | 876.66 |
0T1 1DRX 2ES 4WE | 177 | 784.62 |
1T1 1DRX 3ES 2WE | 169 | 687.05 |
2T1 0DRX 3ES 2WE | 155 | 762.16 |
0T1 2DRX 1ES 4WE | 140 | 741.80 |
1T1 1DRX 4ES 1WE | 138 | 594.34 |
1T1 2DRX 3ES 1WE | 137 | 590.71 |
1T1 3DRX 3ES 0WE | 110 | 495.50 |
0T1 3DRX 1ES 3WE | 75 | 644.24 |
0T1 4DRX 2ES 1WE | 75 | 468.15 |
3T1 1DRX 2ES 1WE | 73 | 702.01 |
0T1 2DRX 2ES 3WE | 68 | 687.70 |
2T1 4DRX 1ES 0WE | 59 | 446.47 |
2T1 1DRX 0ES 4WE | 58 | 840.56 |
0T1 4DRX 1ES 2WE | 58 | 518.35 |
0T1 3DRX 2ES 2WE | 57 | 576.08 |
4T1 2DRX 1ES 0WE | 56 | 636.46 |
1T1 2DRX 0ES 4WE | 52 | 764.51 |
1T1 4DRX 2ES 0WE | 48 | 414.83 |
3T1 3DRX 1ES 0WE | 41 | 544.32 |
2T1 1DRX 2ES 2WE | 29 | 722.63 |
1T1 4DRX 0ES 2WE | 28 | 521.56 |
4T1 1DRX 0ES 2WE | 25 | 791.90 |
3T1 2DRX 2ES 0WE | 25 | 612.33 |
2T1 3DRX 2ES 0WE | 23 | 492.33 |
1T1 1DRX 2ES 3WE | 22 | 748.62 |
1T1 3DRX 2ES 1WE | 20 | 536.59 |
3T1 1DRX 0ES 3WE | 15 | 814.53 |
4T1 1DRX 1ES 1WE | 11 | 754.63 |
1T1 3DRX 1ES 2WE | 11 | 469.73 |
3T1 1DRX 1ES 2WE | 10 | 737.99 |
1T1 1DRX 1ES 4WE | 10 | 784.90 |
1T1 2DRX 2ES 2WE | 9 | 645.80 |
1T1 3DRX 0ES 3WE | 8 | 662.00 |
2T1 3DRX 0ES 2WE | 8 | 586.34 |
2T1 4DRX 0ES 1WE | 8 | 517.38 |
4T1 2DRX 0ES 1WE | 7 | 706.59 |
2T1 2DRX 1ES 2WE | 7 | 679.86 |
2T1 2DRX 2ES 1WE | 7 | 605.94 |
1T1 2DRX 1ES 3WE | 5 | 701.78 |
3T1 3DRX 0ES 1WE | 5 | 606.80 |
3T1 2DRX 0ES 2WE | 4 | 697.63 |
1T1 4DRX 1ES 1WE | 4 | 505.88 |
2T1 1DRX 1ES 3WE | 3 | 737.02 |
2T1 3DRX 1ES 1WE | 3 | 601.01 |
2T1 2DRX 0ES 3WE | 2 | 749.10 |
3T1 2DRX 1ES 1WE | 1 | 663.79 |
There is plenty more that can be extracted from this data, so if you have any questions please leave a comment below, hit me up in the subscriber discord or reach out on Twitter @RotoWireAndrew.